In this article, you'll be presented with some basic elements on how to make up your mind about an issue, particularly where it is complicated, divisive, and perhaps even untested.
Victoria Silvstedt Hilary Swank Whitney Port Minka Kelly Carol Grow
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Are you mulling over something? A step-by-step guide to making up your mind
Living in a world of constant debate and disagreement, evaluating your own position on an issue of special or public importance[1] is sometimes straightforward when based on your beliefs, values, and general knowledge. However, other times it is much harder to make up your mind about an issue because the territory is new to you or to humanity in general, or there are many competing or controversial values and ideas that go into forming the issue under discussion or dispute. When making up your own mind about the issue, it's important to have studied the varied perspectives before reaching your own conclusion. Even then, you are best served by keeping an open mind about future directions and understandings as new information transpires.
In this article, you'll be presented with some basic elements on how to make up your mind about an issue, particularly where it is complicated, divisive, and perhaps even untested.
In this article, you'll be presented with some basic elements on how to make up your mind about an issue, particularly where it is complicated, divisive, and perhaps even untested.
More On News Corp.'s Fox Mobile's Sale: Bitbop Will Go On
We’ve picked up some more detail on News Corp.‘s sale of Fox Mobile Group to Jesta from a source close to the company. The mobile video service Bitbop will remain a going concern, along with all the rest of the division’s assets. Fox Mobile—rebranding to which becomes part of Jesta Mobile Holdings—will also retain all management staff, and, as yet, does not plan any further redudancies in addition to the 15 percent in Germany worldwide that we reported exclusively in November.
Ivanka Trump Blake Lively Christina Applegate Shana Hiatt Tara Conner
Harvard Scientists Disclaim Teen Hearing Loss Epidemic
Last summer, researchers from the Channing Laboratory at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston concluded that teen hearing loss has drastically increased over the last 20 years. The scientists based their conclusions on separate, extensive studies conducted for the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The first survey analyzed the hearing capabilities of 2,500 adolescents between 1988 and 1994, and the second involved 1,791 teens during 2005 and 2006. Well, Harvard Medical School scientists have now performed another investigation into those same numbers, and -- apparently -- the kids are actually alright. According to The Atlantic, the Harvard contrarians determined that, despite the heavy prevalence of MP3s and headphones among modern teens, "the results revealed no change in the prevalence of hearing loss from the early 1990s to the mid-2000s." So, parents should probably lay off their oblivious, hard-rocking kids a little bit -- until the next debatable study arrives, of course. For now, concerned and wary parents can reference the Harvard findings at Pediatrics.
Harvard Scientists Disclaim Teen Hearing Loss Epidemic originally appeared on Switched on Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:55:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Monica Keena Anne Marie Kortright Paige Butcher Amanda Peet Xenia Seeberg
Cutting the (Other) Cord: The Best Wireless Internet Options
A reader asks: I'm intrigued by the idea of getting rid of my DSL Internet service, and switching to one of these 4G wireless services I've seen advertised. My question is whether it's actually viable at this point. I have a desktop and a couple laptops, and two phones we use on our home Wi-Fi network, and wonder if these services can handle all that. I have no idea how to research this, so just tell me what to get!
Dear Reader: Like jetpacks and 'Minority Report'-style computer interfaces, totally wireless high-speed Internet access is one of those tech fantasies that just can't get here soon enough. That's not to say versions of this wireless wonderland don't already exist. All of the major cell phone providers, along with a few third-party players, sell devices that nominally fill this particular bill. It's just that they don't quite do it as well as they seem to promise, and, in some cases, service is woefully lacking.
Consumers have long been able to purchase or rent USB antennas that plug into laptops to grant mobile Internet access, and recent years have seen relatively zippy 3G speeds (or at least speeds on par with low-end DSL home service). Most work rather well, but the data plans can be pricey. And, since only one device is able to go online at a given time, antennas aren't a viable alternative to a home network, which allows multiple gadgets to surf the 'Net simultaneously.
Continue reading Cutting the (Other) Cord: The Best Wireless Internet Options
Cutting the (Other) Cord: The Best Wireless Internet Options originally appeared on Switched on Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Chloë Sevigny Janet Jackson Georgianna Robertson Reese Witherspoon Jordana Brewster
All Those Free Trial CDs Cost AOL Around $300 Million
In the mid-'90s, we remember being befuddled whenever we'd open the Sunday paper to find a CD emblazoned with the AOL logo. Were these people made of money? Were they really giving away compact discs?! As it turns out, yeah, pretty much. According to various former executives, AOL spent something in the neighborhood of $300 million to ship all of those discs.All Those Free Trial CDs Cost AOL Around $300 Million originally appeared on Switched on Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:45:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Roselyn Sanchez Soft Cell Beyoncé Nelly Furtado Leeann Tweeden
Why 2011 isn't 1995 for Apple
By Robert Scoble
In 1995 I remember waiting in lines to buy Windows 95. It effectively ended the design lead Apple had for 11 years in personal computers. From then on Microsoft had both the thought leadership and the market share. Apple ended up with less than 10 percent market share. Microsoft had most of the rest.
Lots of people think that Apple could repeat 1995 in 2011. This time with iOS instead of Macintosh OS and with Google in the place of Microsoft.
We forget one little thing: 1995 was different.
Here's how.
In 1995 Microsoft had a huge marketshare lead with DOS. That meant it had a huge army of developers who didn't want to switch over to Apple's system, which they saw as very closed and inflexible. I remember developers coming into the consumer electronics store I helped run in the 1980s and they'd complain bitterly about Apple's policies (Apple was far less flexible back then than it is today and forced developers to fit into a "look and feel" set of guidelines).
But I look at who is making money. Back in 1995 developers were mostly making money from DOS. Remember, this caused WordPerfect and Borland to make bad bets. They bet on DOS for too long, while Microsoft CEO Bill Gates went and built some of the first and best Macintosh apps. The lesson, though, doesn't pass from 1995 to 2011. Today where are most of the developers making their money? iOS (according to Sephora, Starbucks, OpenTable, eBay, and many other developers). So, Android has to convince developers to switch, or do both platforms at same time. That's quite different.
Plus, back in 1995, who owned the best distribution and supply chains? Microsoft did. Today? Apple does. Apple didn't have stores back in 1995 that will ensure its products get seen in the marketplace. Back then Microsoft could outspend Apple for shelf space at Frys and other retailers. Plus, Microsoft's model of having many OEMs building hardware for its OS was far superior to Apple's approach. Today that's not really true, because the OEMs aren't really able to bring that much value to the table and Apple has the best supply chains in China locked up (I visited one of them about two years ago and keep in touch with the folks there and that's still the case). So, it's not very likely that a Google phone will ship with better screens or better materials. At least not in volume. That is a huge difference from 1995 to today.
Other differences? Apple has outspent Microsoft on advertising around the world. Look at this picture. It's in Paris subway. Apple bought every square inch of advertising space (it bought the entire subway system's advertising space, it seemed, iPad ads were plastered down the entire trackway). Google isn't able to get its message there. That didn't happen in 1995. Remember how dominant Microsoft's advertising was back then? Microsoft even convinced the Empire State Building to change its colors that evening.
Let's go back to how closed Apple is. Most apps this month got approved in less than a week. Some even got approved in less than four days. During the Christmas rush. Is this as good as Android's (you can ship in minutes) policy? No. But, on the other hand, there are quality controls which consumers appreciate. The apps -- overall -- are better on iOS than on Android. Just check out TweetDeck. It crashes every few minutes on my Android phone. Twitter isn't nearly as nice. Facebook isn't as nice. And most apps aren't as well designed, nor crash resistant, as on iOS.
I am sensing a switch, though. Fred Wilson is leading the charge. But other developers are grumbling about Apple and want there to be an alternative and they are all comparing notes with each other. "How's Angry Birds doing with its advertising-only Android apps?" they ask. Very well, the answer comes back. So that means more developers will take the bet on Android, but so far I haven't seen many go "Android only." Why not? Because they know most of the PR comes from journalists who use mostly iOS devices and most of the best users are on iOS devices too (Sephora's lead mobile developer told me 80 percent of the users who pull out a mobile phone in her stores are using iOS, that is echoed by nearly every developer I talk with). Even Swype, which has been kept from delivering their keyboard on iOS devices showed me a prototype of it running on an iPad and the inventor whispered "if Steve Jobs wants to talk, we'd love to ship this on iOS."
So, when someone says that Apple is repeating the mistakes of 1995 (yes, I've been guilty of saying that in the past couple of years too) you should tell them that 2011 is not even close to the same set of conditions as 1995 has.
Photo Credit: Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble is a long-time tech and video blogger who works for Rackspace, where he is part of the building 43 project. He started blogging in 2000 at scobelizer.com; from 2003-2006 he was a high-profile Microsoft evangelist blogger, and he helped start Channel 9. Scoble grew up in Silicon Valley. He is @scobleizer on Twitter.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)